Associations between hair-derived cannabinoid levels, self-reported use, and cannabis-related problems
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2024 Feb 26. doi: 10.1007/s00213-024-06558-0. Online ahead of print.
ABSTRACT
RATIONALE: As cannabis potency and cannabis use are increasing in newly legalized markets, it is increasingly important to measure and examine the effects of cannabinoid exposure.
OBJECTIVES: The current study aims to assess how hair-derived cannabinoid concentrations – offering insight into three-month cumulative exposure – are associated with common self-report measures of cannabis use and cannabis use-related problems.
METHODS: 74 near-daily dependent cannabis users self-reported their quantity of cannabis use, cannabis use-related problems, and estimated cannabis potency. Hair samples were provided to quantify Δ9-THC, CBD, and CBN using LC-MS/MS and THC-consumption was verified by analyzing THC-COOH in hair using GC-MS/MS.
RESULTS: Cannabinoids were detectable in 95.95% of the hair samples from individuals who tested positive on a urine screen for cannabis. Δ9-THC concentrations were positively associated with measures of self-reported potency (relative potency, potency category, and perceived ‘high’), but Δ9-THC, CBD, CBN concentrations and THC/CBD ratio were not associated with self-reported quantity of use. Self-reported potency, but not hair-derived concentrations, were associated with withdrawal and craving. Self-reported quantity of cannabis use, but not cannabinoid concentrations, were associated with cannabis use-related problems.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of hair-derived cannabinoid quantification is supported for detecting cannabis use in near-daily users, but the lack of associations between hair-derived cannabinoid concentrations and self-report measures of use does not support the use of hair analyses alone for quantification of cannabinoid exposure. Further research comparing hair-derived cannabinoid concentrations with other biological matrices (e.g. plasma) and self-report is necessary to further evaluate the validity of hair analyses for this purpose.
PMID:38407636 | DOI:10.1007/s00213-024-06558-0